1

Elbow makes a distinction between the writer and the academic by showing the different emphasis' in either reading or writing. For an academic, reading great works is the best way to learn and experience language. This is because, according to Bartholomae, there are no original works and only those of great academics can be valued. Elbow however, finds that valuing the writer allows for students to express themselves and builds confidence. This confidence allows all writers, even non-academics, to feel like real writers whose text is important enough to be published. Academics have a notion that texts should be treated like peices in a muesum to be worshiped, something that could never be created by an ordinary person.

Posted by stra6907 on September 4, 2008
Tags Uncategorized

Total comments on this page: 2

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)

Comments

No comments yet.

stra6907 on whole page :

I added the bit about Bartholomae only believing that academics can produce writing worth reading.

September 4, 2008 12:54 pm
dra08 on paragraph 1:

Too true. Some academics do. But is that Elbow, Bartholomae, both, neither? Who argues that?
-DrA

September 8, 2008 11:50 am
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Create an account (optional) | Login